A recurring issue in arbitration and construction law is whether an agreement to mediate is enforceable. That is because an arbitration or building contract may contain a clause imposing an obligation to mediate before arbitrating. If the agreement to mediate is enforceable, that likely has certain consequences. The limitation period is likely not running and [...]
Continue Reading →Is An Agreement To Mediate Enforceable?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Is A Third Party Obliged To Bring Its Claim Under An Arbitration Agreement
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
A recurring issue in arbitration law is whether a third party is bound to assert his or her claims by way of arbitration, even though the third party is not a party to the arbitration agreement. In Yaworski v. Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, the Alberta Court of Appeal recently held that, where a limited partnership [...]
Continue Reading →Can Silence Amount To A Fraudulent Misrepresentation?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently dealt with the issue of what sort of representations amount to fraud, and what representations survive an “entire agreements” clause. In Iatomasi v. Conciatori, the Court of Appeal held that when, during the pre-contractual negotiations for the sale of a building , a vendor delivers plans to a purchaser, [...]
Continue Reading →Ontario Court of Appeal Affirms Legal Principles For Agent’s Authority And Liquidated Damage
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Two recurring issues in construction law are the authority of agents and liquidated damages. The agency issue is this: if the principal is to be made liable on a contract made by the agent, must the principal, and not the agent, be the one that promotes the agent’s authority? The damage issue is this: can [...]
Continue Reading →ULCC Working Group Issues Discussion Paper On A New Uniform International Commercial Arbitration Act
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
In January 2013, a Working Group of the Uniform Law Conference of Canada (“ULCC”) issued a Discussion Paper with respect to proposals for a new Uniform International Commercial Arbitration Act. The Discussion Paper is intended to generate consultations by May 2013 and final approval by the ULCC in August 2013. Background to the Discussion Paper [...]
Continue Reading →Which Term Prevails In A Building Contract: The Specifications, Or A Warranty Of Fitness For Purpose?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
A building contract usually includes a term requiring that the work or materials supplied adhere to the specifications. The contract may also contain implied or express warranties that the work will be fit for the intended purposes of the building project and free of defects. What happens when those terms result in inconsistent results? What [...]
Continue Reading →Does The UNCITRAL Model Law Apply To A Claim Under The Consumer Protection Act?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Queen’s Bench Court for Saskatchewan recently applied the Saskatchewan International Commercial Arbitration Act (SICAA) and the UNCITRAL Model law annexed to that Act and stayed an action based on the Saskatchewan Consumer Protection Act and a contract which was apparently between two Canadian entities. The decision in Zwack v. Pocha is important for two [...]
Continue Reading →Two Construction Lien Issues: Architect’s Pro-Forma Certificate Is Invalid; GST Must Be Added To Holdback
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Superior Court recently decided two important issues relating to construction liens. In Wellington Plumbing & Heating Ltd. v. Villa Nicolini Incorporated, the court held that a late-issued pro forma architect’s certificate was invalid, and that GST must be added to a holdback. Factual Background Villa Nicolini constructed a retirement home in Vaughan. The [...]
Continue Reading →Supreme Court Denies Leave In Tender Case – Refuses To Re-Write History
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Supreme Court of Canada has recently refused leave to appeal in Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. Ltd. v. Canada. In doing so, it has upheld the decisions of the Federal Court Trial Division and Federal Court of Appeal which declined to permit a bidder to rely on after-the-fact information to overturn an invitation to tender. [...]
Continue Reading →