The Supreme Court of Canada has recently refused leave to appeal in Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. Ltd. v. Canada. In doing so, it has upheld the decisions of the Federal Court Trial Division and Federal Court of Appeal which declined to permit a bidder to rely on after-the-fact information to overturn an invitation to tender. [...]
Continue Reading →Supreme Court Denies Leave In Tender Case – Refuses To Re-Write History
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Is The Person Who Ultimately Pays A Guarantor Entitled To The Securities Held By The Guarantor?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Bonds and other forms of guarantees and indemnities are commonly used on construction projects. If a contractor applies for a performance bond, the bonding company will require the contractor to indemnify the bonding company. The bonding company may also require the principal shareholder of the contractor to guarantee the contractor’s obligation and to directly indemnify [...]
Continue Reading →If You Want Specific Performance, Do You Still Have To Mitigate Your Damages?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Is a party to a contract obligated to mitigate its damages at the same time that it is asking the court to order specific performance? Since the party wants the contract performed, not damages for non-performance, the obligation to mitigate seems to be totally inapplicable. Yet, in Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School [...]
Continue Reading →Can Someone Be Compelled To Arbitrate By Estoppel?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Can the conduct of the parties after they have signed a commercial contract influence the interpretation of the arbitration agreement contained in that contract? If they take one position during the performance of the contract with respect to whether a dispute is arbitrable, can they be estopped from asserting to the contrary when a dispute [...]
Continue Reading →Ontario’s Highest Court Upholds NAFTA Arbitration Against Mexico
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Court of Appeal has just released an important decision upholding an arbitration award under NAFTA against Mexico. This decision shows that Canadian courts will be reluctant to interfere on jurisdictional grounds with the remedial decisions of international commercial arbitrations. In The United Mexican States v. Cargill, Incorporated, Mexico opposed the recognition in Ontario [...]
Continue Reading →