The last article about the decision of the Superior Court of Ontario in Envoy Relocation Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 ONSC 2034 considered the impact of that case upon the Contract A - Contract B principles of tender law. There are many more interesting issues which emerge from that case. This article considers [...]
Continue Reading →The Mother Of All Tender Cases Revisited: Three More Issues
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Mother Of All Tender Cases!
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent decision in Envoy Relocation Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) certainly deserves the title of Mother of All Tender Cases. It is a judgment of over 1800 paragraphs in which Mr. Justice Annis of the Superior Court of Ontario analyzed and found in great depth how an invitation to tender by the federal [...]
Continue Reading →Is A “May Arbitrate” Clause Mandatory Or Permissive?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
What is the meaning of an arbitration clause which states that a dispute “may be determined by arbitration”? Does the clause mean that the arbitration process is permitted but not mandatory? Or does the word “may” mean that the parties do not have to have a dispute, but if they do, the arbitration clause applies? [...]
Continue Reading →Who Is A Successor To A Contract?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Most commercial agreements contain a clause stating that the contract is binding upon and for the benefit of “successors.” For example, Article 10.1 of the CCDC Cost Plus Contract states that the contract “shall enure to the benefit of and be binding on…successors”. What does the word “successors” mean? Who are “successors”? Do those who [...]
Continue Reading →Does A Mediation Agreement Suspend The Limitation Period Or The Period To Set Down A Lien For Trial?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
An agreement to mediate is often found in arbitration and building contracts. Yet, the impact of mediation upon court or arbitral proceedings is uncertain. Does an agreement to mediate mean that, until the mediation occurs, there is no cause of action and therefore there is no entitlement to commence arbitration or an action? In that [...]
Continue Reading →Can Silence Amount To A Fraudulent Misrepresentation?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently dealt with the issue of what sort of representations amount to fraud, and what representations survive an “entire agreements” clause. In Iatomasi v. Conciatori, the Court of Appeal held that when, during the pre-contractual negotiations for the sale of a building , a vendor delivers plans to a purchaser, [...]
Continue Reading →What Does A CGL Policy Cover After Progressive Homes?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
A: OVERVIEW The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co of Canada[1] is a seminal decision with respect to the application of CGL policies to the construction industry. While the immediate effect of the decision was with respect to the insurer’s duty to defend the insured, [...]
Continue Reading →Is The Owner Liable For Delaying The Commencement Of The Building Project?
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Time is money on a building project. And the obligation of the owner and the contractor to proceed expeditiously with the project may be one of the most important aspects of their relationship. But what if the owner delays in notifying the contractor of the award, or in signing the building contract? Can the owner [...]
Continue Reading →Incorporation By Reference In Building Contracts
Posted by: Thomas G. Heintzman
Incorporation by reference in building contracts By Thomas G. Heintzman and Julie Parla1 A common clause in a building contract is one which incorporates the terms of another contract or document into the building contract in issue. The effect of such a clause is referred to as “Incorporation by Reference”. These clauses are common in [...]
Continue Reading →